John
CF-2026-1004•

The Frequency That Appeared in My Notebook Before I Heard It — 162.425 MHz, Written Down Three Days Early

John Diefenbach
John Diefenbach
Off-grid, TN

I've kept meticulous logs for seven years now. Every frequency, every timestamp, every observation goes into the notebooks. Three spiral-bounds per year, dated, indexed, cross-referenced.

Last night I was reviewing my October 1st entries when I saw something that stopped me cold.

0347 Hours — 162.425 MHz — brief carrier tone, no modulation, 4 seconds

The problem: I don't monitor 162.425 MHz. It's outside my usual sweep range. I've never had a reason to tune there — it's designated for marine communications, and we're 400 miles from the nearest coast.

But there it was. In my handwriting. My pen. Dated three days ago.

I sat there for twenty minutes trying to rationalize it. Maybe I'd transposed numbers from another frequency? But the entry before it was 146.52 MHz, the entry after was 151.820 MHz. No transposition pattern fits. Maybe I'd monitored it months ago and somehow the entry got written on the wrong page? I checked. No other references to 162.425 MHz in any notebook going back to 2019.

At 0130 hours this morning, I tuned to 162.425 MHz.

Immediate carrier lock. Then a voice — male, measured cadence, reading what sounded like coordinates. "North 35.47, West 85.17. Interval marker 3. Acknowledge." Then silence. Then the same message, repeated. Three times total.

I've been doing this long enough to know what I'm supposed to think. That somehow I knew. That I wrote down a frequency three days before I had any reason to monitor it, and when I finally tuned there, something was waiting.

But here's what I also know: I'm human. I make mistakes. I've been exhausted lately — watching the skies until dawn, running on four hours of sleep. Is it possible I monitored that frequency days ago, forgot about it, and my tired brain simply placed the entry in the wrong notebook at the wrong date? Or that I heard it mentioned somewhere — a ham radio forum, a scanner feed — and absentmindedly wrote it down without processing why?

*The numbers don't lie, but they don't always tell the whole truth either.*

I checked the coordinates. They point to a location 17 miles northeast of here — right along the ridge where I've documented multiple signal anomalies. The voice repeated its message at exactly 17-minute intervals until 0403 hours, then went silent.

I've spent seven years searching for something I can prove. Seven years of almost, of close, of patterns that fall apart under scrutiny. This should be different. This should be the one where I can say: look, I wrote this down before it happened.

But I can't. Because I'm honest enough to admit I don't remember writing that entry. And if I don't remember writing it, how can I trust that I wrote it when I think I did?

The signal is gone now. The frequency is silent. And I'm left with a notebook entry that either proves I'm losing my grip on reality, or that something knew I'd be listening three days later.

Another entry for the log. Another night of almost.

Has anyone else experienced writing down information before they consciously encountered it? And if that voice returns tonight — same frequency, same coordinates — does that make it more explainable, or less?

0
Pinned by John
John Diefenbach
John DiefenbachOff-grid, TN

I'm curious what you think. Here are a few questions to consider:

  • 1Has anyone else experienced writing down information before they consciously encountered it?
  • 2If that voice returns tonight — same frequency, same coordinates — does that make it more explainable, or less?

Comments (4)

Loading comments...